On Wednesday’s episode of ABC’s “The View,” co-host Whoopi Goldberg expressed strong disapproval of Senator JD Vance’s controversial comments from 2021, in which he criticized prominent Democrats without children, such as Vice President Kamala Harris, for allegedly lacking a stake in the country’s future. This confrontation highlights the ongoing cultural divide between conservative and liberal perspectives on family values and political representation.
‘How Dare You’: Whoopi Goldberg Upset JD Vance Said Country Ruined by ‘a Bunch of Childless Cat Ladies Video:
Goldberg introduced the segment by referring to a resurfaced video of Vance, asserting, “A resurfaced video of JD Vance is not really helping him connect with a lot of voters. Take a look.” The clip showed Vance, appearing on Fox News in 2021, making remarks that have since drawn significant backlash.
Trending: Steve Bannon’s Supreme Court Appeal Gains Republican Support
In the video, Vance stated, “We’re effectively ruining this country via the Democrats via our corporate oligarchs by a bunch of childless cat ladies miserable at their own lives and the choices they made so they want to make the rest of the country miserable too. It’s a basic fact. Look at Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, AOC, the entire future of the Democrats is controlled by people without children. How does it make any sense that we’ve turned our country over to people who don’t really have a direct stake in it?”
.@michaeljknowles to @megynkelly on Vance’s “childless cat lady” concerns.
“It is kind of odd when the leaders of our nations don’t want to have kids. They’re not even interested in the future.” pic.twitter.com/flTSQTzXYg
— Daily Wire (@realDailyWire) July 24, 2024
Goldberg responded to Vance’s comments with palpable indignation. “Sir, there are people who have chosen not to have children for whatever reason. There are people who want to have children who cannot,” she said. She continued, “How dare you. You never had a baby. Your wife had a baby, but you never had a baby. So you know nothing about this. And how dare you. And women, you heard how he thinks of you. Yeah. This is not good for you, JD. Now, what the hell?”
Vance’s comments reflect a broader concern about the direction of the Democratic Party and its leadership. The notion that individuals who do not have children might lack a vested interest in the country’s future resonates with many conservatives who prioritize family values and see them as integral to societal stability. The argument suggests that leaders with children have a personal stake in the long-term well-being of the nation, which could influence their policy decisions.
They are really desperate!
To tell us how great Kamala is…here’s Cat Lady @MollyJongFast
Watch the desperation! pic.twitter.com/FTJXCcoA0G
— Sebastian Gorka DrG (@SebGorka) July 22, 2024
Critics of Vance’s remarks, primarily from liberal circles, argue that his views are exclusionary and fail to recognize the contributions of childless individuals to society. They point out that personal choices about family and child-rearing do not determine one’s commitment to public service or the country’s future. This perspective emphasizes the importance of diversity in leadership, including different life experiences and perspectives, to address the complex challenges facing the nation.
Goldberg’s vehement response underscores the sensitivity of the issue and the deep divisions it can provoke. Her defense of childless individuals, whether by choice or circumstance, highlights a broader cultural shift towards recognizing and valuing diverse life paths. From her standpoint, Vance’s comments are not only offensive but also indicative of a narrow-minded view that undermines the principles of equality and inclusion.
‘He’s So Vile!’ CNN Morning Crew Beats Up On Trump VP Pick Vance Over ‘Cat Lady’ Remark https://t.co/7fWIDZJghY via @mediaite pic.twitter.com/TObXiEjG7G
— Tommy moderna-vaX-Topher (@tommyxtopher) July 24, 2024
The conservative rebuttal to this critique is that it misses the broader point about vested interests and accountability in leadership. Vance’s supporters might argue that having children naturally instills a deeper sense of responsibility towards future generations, which can translate into more prudent and future-oriented policymaking. They contend that this perspective is not about devaluing those without children but rather about advocating for leaders who have a personal and tangible stake in the nation’s long-term success.
GOOD morning ☀️ to this “childless cat lady.”
Meow Meow ✌🏽
(Time magazine. Dec 2023)@taylorswift13 #taylorswift pic.twitter.com/vwAEwazEnm— Lisa Catara 💎 (@lisa_catara) July 24, 2024
The clash between Goldberg and Vance encapsulates a fundamental ideological divide in contemporary American politics. It raises important questions about the qualities and experiences that are deemed valuable in political leaders and how these attributes influence their decision-making and priorities. As the nation grapples with complex issues that require thoughtful and inclusive solutions, this debate is likely to continue shaping public discourse and political dynamics.
Sponsors:
Huge Spring Sale Underway On MyPillow Products
Use Promo Code FLS At Checkout
Inflation Buster: Freedom From High-Cost Cell Plans (50% off first month with promo code: FLS)
Freedom From High-Cost Cell Plans Same Phones, Same Numbers, Same Coverage For About Half The Price.
Eric Thompson