One of the most difficult conundrums for those who expect equal justice for all is the frequent attempts by radical leftists to enact unconstitutional legislation.
An outspoken and anti-white Congresswoman, Democrat Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas, is introducing legislation that would end free speech for white people in the United States.
The representative wants to define “hate speech” in a way that only white people can be charged with the related crimes defined in the language of the bill.
In her “Leading Against White Supremacy Act of 2023,” as clearly suggested in the name of the bill, it would only apply to white people.
Only those, “not of color”, could be charged for objecting to open borders, criticizing minorities, or advocating for the preservation of traditional American culture.
On its face, this act if passed would be struck down as unconstitutional, due to the protections and rights included in the 1st and 14th amendments.
The First Amendment says:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Section one of the Fourteen Amendment includes:
“No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
Under legislation proposed by Jackson Lee, a white person could face federal imprisonment for simply posting online about the impact of open borders immigration on American culture, similar to what is happening in some far-left European countries where the government targets its own citizens.
“A person engages in a white supremacy [sic] inspired hate crime when white supremacy ideology has motivated the planning, development, preparation, or perpetration of actions that constituted a crime or were undertaken in furtherance of activity that, if effectuated, would have constituted a crime,” the bill from Jackson Lee reads.
The National File reported:
Under Jackson Lee’s legislation, if federal investigators determine that the web postings of a third party had “inspire[d]” someone else, even someone they don’t know, to commit a federal hate crime, that person would be arrested, and federally charged with a hate crime of their own.
Specifically, Jackson Lee targets Americans who are in favor of border security, calling out “replacement theory” by name, an ideology that holds that open borders and mass migration into the Western World are part of a deliberate effort to “replace” white people in their native lands.
As the legislation explains, two people could be charged in relation to the same, lone wolf-style attack if, “at least one of [them] published material advancing white supremacy, white supremacist ideology, antagonism based on ‘replacement theory’, or hate speech that vilifies or is otherwise directed against any non-White person or group.” Even if they don’t know each other.
Especially, if the material “was published on a social media platform.”
Read Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee’s Entire Bill HERE
Sponsor
PureTalk – Save Big Money On Your Cell Phone Bill (Use Promo”FLSfree” to get one free month)