No Justice! 3 Clinton Donors Allowed On Campaign Atty’s Jury

It is too much to ask for things to be done in accordance with the law?  For judges and others in powerful positions to use basic reasoning when making influencial decisions?

In what should be impossible, as many as three donors to Hillary Clinton’s past presidential campaigns are members of the jury in the trial of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann in Washington, D.C., who faces the sole charge of lying to the FBI.

Prosecutors working with Special Counsel John H. Durham argue that Sussmann concealed his work for the campaign when passing along the information to the FBI to prevent them from seeing an alleged link between then-candidate Donald Trump and Russia, via Alfa Bank.

The Alfa Bank claim was later found to be baseless.

But all of the testimony including the explosive claim by former Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook that she herself personally approved the leak of the Alfa Bank theory to the media in the might now matter now, given the biased makeup of the jury.

The New York Post recently reported:

Special counsel John Durham’s team objected to putting one Clinton contributor on the panel after the man said he would “strive for impartiality as best I can.”

Another Clinton supporter, a former bartender who appeared to be in her 20s, said she’d also donated to progressive firebrand Ocasio-Cortez (D-The Bronx, Queens) but was put on the panel after a Sussmann defense lawyer told her that neither Clinton nor former President Donald Trump were on trial and asked if she could be impartial.

Another woman, who appeared to be in her 40s, said she likely donated to Clinton’s 2016 campaign but wasn’t entirely sure.

Another juror had a husband who worked on Clinton’s first failed presidential campaign in 2008 but was allowed to serve on the jury anyway.

See also  Migrants Complain That New Yorkers Don’t Learn African Languages

Writing in The Hill, George Washington University legal scholar Jonathan Turley observed that Sussmann had received indulgences that were denied to former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, who was prosecuted for the same crime.

For those who reject the idea that a select group of powerful individuals has their own set of rules, the fact that Hillary’s campaign lawyer can have enough tainted jurors allowed in the deliberations to prevent a guilty conviction should convince them that the unbiased justice once again died for an elitist.

With those who did crooked Hillary’s dirty deeds not being found guilty, her personal defense stays in tack, Clinton’s special justice on display.


Tuttle Twins – We teach your kids how the world really works – 35% Off Sale

Continue Reading
You may also like...

Conservative independent talk show host and owner of https://FinishTheRace. USMC Veteran fighting daily to preserve Faith - Family - Country values in the United States of America.


More in Corruption

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Awesome Deals On Products (Promo code "FTR")

Download My Podcasts Below

Eric Thompson Show Podcast